Division of Philosophy
Course Number PHL 612: Philosophy of LawWinter 2014
SECTION ONE PARTICULAR (011)
Instructor(s): Alex Wellington
Office: Room 428, Jorgenson Hall*
Cellphone: 979-5000 ext. 4057
(E-mail address)**: [email protected] ca
OR alex. [email protected] ca
Business office Hours Posted:
Wednesdays at a couple of: 10 pm hours, By Scheduled appointment
Wednesdays in 3: twelve pm including 4: 10 pm, Drop In Time
Thursdays at three or more: 10 evening, By Appointment
*Other times may be offered by visit
Website: Blackboard course website available through my. ryerson. ca
This is certainly an Upper Level Open-handed Studies study course
PHL 612 Beliefs of Legislation [Calendar Description]: What is law? The actual something the best norm? Should certainly citizens often obey what the law states? What is the relationship between law and morality? This course can explore rivalling theories of law, just like natural rules and positivism, and feel on essential debates more than civil disobedience, purposes of punishment, and interpretation of legal text messages. It will manage contemporary techniques over the legal regulation of human behaviour, for instance in things of lovemaking morality.
Degrees will be identified in the next manner:
Midterm Test out
Week 11 (March 28)
*Essay Project will be 1750 - 2250 words (Approximately 7 - 9 pages) OR Alternate Community-based/ Services Learning Chance
Marks pertaining to assignments will probably be posted on Program Website on Blackboard
Any alterations in a of the above will be talked about in class prior to being executed. The usual process for making changes to the grading scheme comes with: (a) discussing the changes with all the class; (b) making this sort of revisions at the earliest possible time in the course; and (c) confirming the changes equally orally in addition to writing (handout or placing to training course website).
BE AWARE: Faculty Program Surveys will probably be administered on the net
Readings and Solutions:
There will be a Course Website on Blackboard.
Course readings will be composed of selected record articles and court situations as specific in the Course Routine.
The readings will be itemized and numbered in the Course Schedule beneath. All program readings can be accessed electronically. Many are available through backlinks found in the Course Psychic readings area of the program website in Blackboard (through Ryerson University Library electronic digital holdings). Court cases can be accessed through the CanLII website.
NOTE: The complete references and citations for the psychic readings follow beneath the heading " Sources/ Recommendations for Program Readings”.
Powerpoint Delivering presentations and Teachers Supplemental Records will be placed in the Papers area of the program website about Blackboard. Additional documents will be posted inside the Documents place, and figures and chart are posted in the Data area.
Please be aware: A variety and variety of blood pressure measurements on the issues are incorporated into order to offer students choices for the article topics; just specified psychic readings will be the focus of the inquiries on the middle term test and final test.
ELABORATION ON COURSE CONTENT:
In this training course we will focus on the conceptual concerns arising from philosophical questions about law: What is law? What makes law valid? How do meaning norms and legal best practice rules overlap, and yet ultimately, vary from each other? How can moral points of views impact upon and impact the assemblage and presentation of legal norms? About what ways do particular interpretations of legal documents and legal rulings provide reasons behind acting or perhaps deciding (if one is a judge)? Exactly what are judges disagreeing about after they disagree about how precisely to decide a certain case -- what the law is, or what it ought to become? Does the actual law is sometime be based upon what it ought to be? Will be we morally obligated to obey every law, even when the content of a particular legislation is...
Info: (8) Bedford v. Canada, 2013 SCC 72 (Supreme Court of Canada). Available online:
(13) Ur. v. Butler  one particular S. C. R. 452 (Supreme The courtroom of Canada), 1992 CanLII 124 (SCC).
(15) Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys,  you S. C. R. 256, 2006 SCC 6
Available on the web: CanLII:
(16) Trinity Western University v. British Columbia School of Educators,  one particular S. C. R. 772, 2001 SCC 31
(17) Dworkin, Ronald. 1982. " Law since Interpretation”. Critical Inquiry, Volume 9, Number 1, The National politics of Presentation (September 1982), pages 179-200.
(18) Dworkin, Ronald. 1985. " Rules 's Goals for Itself”. Virginia Law Review, Volume 71, Second seed (March 1985), pages 173-187.
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Component I from the Constitution Act, 1982 becoming
Plan B towards the Canada Act 1982 (U. K. ), 1982, c. 11. Areas 1, two, 3, six, 9, 12, 11, 12, and 15. Available Online: CanLII: http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/const/const1982.html
Christman, John. 2003/ 2009. " Autonomy in Meaningful and Politics Philosophy”. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available online: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/autonomy-moral/
Crenshaw, Kimberle, Neil Gotanda, Gary Peller, and Kendall Thomas, editors
Flojo, Richard and Jean Stefancic. 2012. Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. Second Edition. Nyc University Press.
Delgado, Richard and Jean Stefancic, editors. 1999. Essential Race Theory: The Leading edge. Second Release. Temple University or college Press. Obtainable through Ryerson University Selection; Call Amount: KF4755. C75 2000 �
Dworkin, Gerald. 1971. " Paternalism”. In Morality and the Law, modified by Richard Wasserstrom (Wadsworth, 1971), internet pages 107-126
Finnis, John. 2007. " Organic Law Theory”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Viewpoint. Available online:
Fuller, Lon. 1964/ 1969. The Values of Rules. Revised Release. Yale School Press.
Green, Leslie. 2003. " Legal Positivism”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available: